Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: HockeyBuzz Hotstove: Hotstove: Do You Want Hybrid Icing?
Author Message
HockeyBuzz Fast Take
Joined: 07.26.2011

Aug 5 @ 12:10 PM ET
HockeyBuzz Hotstove: Hotstove: Do You Want Hybrid Icing?
mschmidt5919
Detroit Red Wings
Location: MI
Joined: 03.25.2013

Aug 5 @ 12:24 PM ET
It's a good rule...except it's just another judgement call that's going to piss people off constantly
Adam French
Atlanta Thrashers
Location: Isn't Cooley 5"11? You know who else is 5"11? Sydney Crosby. - Scabeh
Joined: 04.06.2011

Aug 5 @ 12:38 PM ET
I want it. It will help some major injuries.


But everybody will hate it when it happens to them. Just like everything.


There is no winning for NHL officiating.
WaterBoy
Location: The opposite of what Pat says, YT
Joined: 06.27.2006

Aug 5 @ 1:10 PM ET
yes
nated81
Edmonton Oilers
Location: ON
Joined: 07.09.2013

Aug 5 @ 2:05 PM ET
They should stick with touch icing and get rid of the trapezoid so that the goalies can come out and get the puck if it looks like his dman is going to lose the race. If they switch to hybrid icing, there is still a chance that someone will get hurt in the race for the puck but instead of the dman it will be the forward that is winning the race getting ran into the end boards.
SnipeTheFight
Ottawa Senators
Location: Ottawa, ON
Joined: 02.20.2013

Aug 5 @ 2:30 PM ET
It's okay... I don't like the idea of refs having more responsibility though.
bobert836
New Jersey Devils
Location: Buying a dolphin and putting it in your swimming pool makes more sense, BC
Joined: 06.19.2010

Aug 5 @ 4:32 PM ET
They should stick with touch icing and get rid of the trapezoid so that the goalies can come out and get the puck if it looks like his dman is going to lose the race. If they switch to hybrid icing, there is still a chance that someone will get hurt in the race for the puck but instead of the dman it will be the forward that is winning the race getting ran into the end boards.
- nated81


As long as Brodeur is still playing, the trapezoid isn't going anywhere. Such a bullpoop rule to begin with
nated81
Edmonton Oilers
Location: ON
Joined: 07.09.2013

Aug 5 @ 4:36 PM ET
As long as Brodeur is still playing, the trapezoid isn't going anywhere. Such a bullpoop rule to begin with
- bobert836

I guess when a goalie scores more goals in a season than some players, they have to do something.
Tartan69
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Section 112, PA
Joined: 06.26.2007

Aug 5 @ 9:49 PM ET
I hate Brodeur and the Devils, but that trapezoid is a crime. Just because the guy is the best of all time at doing something doesn't mean you should change the rules to negate his skills.
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 09.26.2010

Aug 6 @ 2:18 PM ET
It's okay... I don't like the idea of refs having more responsibility though.
- SnipeTheFight



This.
Ovation
Montreal Canadiens
Location: QC
Joined: 10.27.2006

Aug 6 @ 3:44 PM ET
I guess it's better than nothing, but I'd rather no-touch icing.
Sven22
Detroit Red Wings
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Joined: 12.24.2007

Aug 6 @ 10:39 PM ET
At least go to hybrid icing, though really I think it should go all the way to no touch. Take the judgment of the referee and the chance of an unavoidable, high-risk, low reward collision completely out of the equation.

Sure you lose that once-every-few-games race where the forechecker is actually even close, or even beats out the touch and creates a chance. But you know what? Who cares? Nobody goes to hockey games to watch players leg out icing calls.

Make the game safer and all it costs is the removal of one semi-rare, moderately-at-best exciting play that might lead to one goal per season per team? That seems like a no-brainer to me.
bobert836
New Jersey Devils
Location: Buying a dolphin and putting it in your swimming pool makes more sense, BC
Joined: 06.19.2010

Aug 7 @ 12:30 AM ET
At least go to hybrid icing, though really I think it should go all the way to no touch. Take the judgment of the referee and the chance of an unavoidable, high-risk, low reward collision completely out of the equation.

Sure you lose that once-every-few-games race where the forechecker is actually even close, or even beats out the touch and creates a chance. But you know what? Who cares? Nobody goes to hockey games to watch players leg out icing calls.

Make the game safer and all it costs is the removal of one semi-rare, moderately-at-best exciting play that might lead to one goal per season per team? That seems like a no-brainer to me.

- Sven22


It's not all necessarily about the team that ices the puck getting a chance, but the chance the other team will be getting. A faceoff in the offensive zone with tired players on the ice. If an attacking skater can easily out skate the defender or even if its close, its not really fair if it gets blown down immediately.
CaliNewf
Ottawa Senators
Location: AB
Joined: 02.06.2010

Aug 7 @ 1:14 AM ET
What about the forward getting smashed into the end boards? Just go with no touch icing, it will be as seamless as taking the red line out.
flyler
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: LA, CA
Joined: 05.23.2008

Aug 7 @ 12:00 PM ET
I'm for letting it play out in preseason before making a final decision. We need to take a serious look at it for the overall health of the players.
Sven22
Detroit Red Wings
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Joined: 12.24.2007

Aug 7 @ 12:15 PM ET
It's not all necessarily about the team that ices the puck getting a chance, but the chance the other team will be getting. A faceoff in the offensive zone with tired players on the ice. If an attacking skater can easily out skate the defender or even if its close, its not really fair if it gets blown down immediately.
- bobert836


It's only "not fair" because we're used to the rule the way it is. No-touch has been the rule in Europe for over 20 years.

I say if somebody shoots or passes the puck from their side of center and can't connect with a teammate before it crosses the goal line, I'm fine with calling that icing regardless of who can get to the puck first. It's not like you're taking a legitimate strategy out of the playbook. Nobody intentionally ices the puck because they think their forechecker can beat out the call. It's just that every now and then the forechecker is fast enough to cover the mistake.
quinnjj
Pittsburgh Penguins
Location: PA
Joined: 06.05.2012

Aug 7 @ 9:33 PM ET
Yes
Ben37
Pittsburgh Penguins
Location: One of the Most Respected Hockeybuzz Posters, AB
Joined: 04.07.2010

Aug 8 @ 12:38 AM ET
I am for it.
scottak
Location: I am serious. And don't call me Shirley!
Joined: 08.06.2010

Aug 8 @ 9:37 AM ET
Move icing from behind the red line to behind the defending blue line. As soon as you reach the neutral zone, you can dump the puck. This will cut down on stoppages and make the game faster.
nascarguy
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: I smell Kraft Dinner, ON
Joined: 01.18.2006

Aug 8 @ 4:39 PM ET
absolutely not!!!! takes away from the game.. they are professionals, not pee wee.. they know the risks.. they already have destroyed the fun of competition, with this whole everybody wins bs, turning what should be good competitive fun into a wussy fest because there is nothing to play for if everyone wins..they know the risks, let em play! stop trying to make everything so safe, theres a point when its going over board, and its happening now!. just like my rambling!! but I think I made my point
nascarguy
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: I smell Kraft Dinner, ON
Joined: 01.18.2006

Aug 8 @ 4:41 PM ET
also why cant the nhl just leave the game alone and stop messing with the rules every year
scottak
Location: I am serious. And don't call me Shirley!
Joined: 08.06.2010

Aug 8 @ 5:27 PM ET
also why cant the nhl just leave the game alone and stop messing with the rules every year
- nascarguy


How far back would you like to go? Straight sticks? Pucks kept on the ice? No helmets or goalie mask? A couple guys with brooms and a hose to 'resurface' the ice? Chicken wire instead of plexi-glass?

The game and players evolve. It's not 1917 anymore.
jmatchett383
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Newark, DE
Joined: 03.09.2010

Aug 10 @ 8:35 AM ET
Absolutely not. One of my favorite plays is when a player starts 5 strides behind a defender but it able to outrace him and negate icing.

I understand that injuries happen when 2 players go full steam ahead into the boards. But I'd wager that don't involve trying to touch up icings, so let's just eliminate hitting on all plays. Also, I've seen players/officials get cut by skates, so let's just eliminate them, and the players can wear snow shoes. Also, that puck is very hard, it could hurt someone, so let's make it a nerf ball. Lastly, those sticks get swung around and could maybe hurt someone one day, so let's give them all styrofoam sticks. Can't possibly have someone get hurt in a contact sport, right?